MEDICAL REVIEW

Medical Review Policy

How professional review is identified—and when it is not claimed.

Current status: The migrated article archive does not claim independent clinical review by a named qualified reviewer. “Medically reviewed” is used only when a real, suitably qualified reviewer has reviewed the relevant page.

When medical review is appropriate

Professional review may be appropriate for clinically sensitive topics, symptom interpretation, disease information, medication-related content, screening guidance and other content where errors could materially affect health decisions.

What a reviewer checks

A reviewer may assess factual accuracy, clinical framing, important limitations, red-flag advice, terminology and whether sources reasonably support the claims made.

Reviewer identification

When review occurs, the page should identify the reviewer, relevant credentials and review date. Credentials are not inferred or embellished.

Pages without medical review

General wellness, fitness or calculator pages may be source-checked without a formal medical reviewer. Such pages should not imply professional review that did not happen.

Review does not create a doctor-patient relationship

Even professionally reviewed content remains general information and does not replace individualized care from a clinician who knows the reader's history.

Last updated: .